|
Tech to Terror Proof Your Organization
Nobody could have imagined that the latest security threat would be so malicious: Terrorist attacks. But it's happened, and now organizations are scrambling to protect themselves against it. We interacted with 30 CIOs to understand what they're planning to do and provide some advice on how to secure your IT infrastructure
Thursday, January 01, 2009
Anil Chopra and Anindya Roy
By now, there's been ample media coverage of the terror attacks in Mumbai,
and how terrorists managed to use the loopholes in our system to achieve their
objective. Never before was there such an uproar from the entire nation over
this episode, which clearly reflects that we've run out of patience at the lax
attitude of the govt. toward the country's security. While we wait for the govt.
to do something about it, it's time we also did something to combat this menace.
After all, security is everyone's responsibility, if we don't want any further
loss of lives, property, business, and market reputation. We received lots of
queries from many CIOs on how should they use IT to protect their
infrastructure. Considering that IT systems are the backbone of most businesses,
the CIOs obviously have a reason to worry.
So in order to understand what Indian enterprises are doing to secure their
infrastructures, we did a small survey of around 30 CIOs from leading
organizations across the country. By and large, everyone's definitely worried. A
majority of the CIOs said that their organization was very worried about the
security of their infrastructure, and were quite serious about doing something
about it. Some of them had even gotten special budgets sanctioned for
strengthening their IT security.
The right way to deploy IT security
But before you scramble to deploy high-tech equipment like DFMDs (door frame
metal detector), surveillance systems, etc, you need to understand the scope of
the problem and the role IT can play in combating terror. Technology can
certainly help combat terror, but its usage has to be clearly understood in
order to choose the right equipment. For instance, even if the surveillance
system detects a terrorist, or the DFMD detects heavy metallic objects being
brought into the premises, they can't really stop them. Their objective is to
detect and monitor, and not protect. That doesn't mean you shouldn't deploy such
systems. You need to understand their effectiveness in combating terror. For
instance, the US has deployed video surveillance cameras at many of its
airports, which can identify baggage that remains unattended for some time.
Similarly, video monitoring technologies have been deployed to check if a
vehicle circles a high-rise building more than required, or if a person makes
multiple trips to the shopping mall within a specified period of time. All of
these technologies can certainly help in raising an alert if something goes
wrong.
Unfortunately, that's not how technology has been used in India. For
instance, the Taj hotel in Mumbai had also deployed CCTV, but when the
terrorists attacked it, they took over the control room because it was located
within the hotel's premise itself. Since the terrorists knew the hotel inside
out before attacking, they made the control room inaccessible to the security
forces. Had the hotel used IP Surveillance, then the entire hotel could have
been monitored from outside, and many more innocent lives could have been saved.
 |
In another incident, which was much more mild than this, but puts the point
across, is of a close acquaintance of mine who lost her bag in a shopping mall.
The bag contained all her cards (credit, ATM, etc), as well as cash. She
immediately informed the mall's security personnel about the incident.
Thankfully, the mall had CCTV installed at its entrance, and had recorded all
movements in that area. Upon playing back the video, they were able to spot the
thief (apparently a small boy), walking away with the bag out of the mall. This
sounded like good news, but only for a while, because they soon realized that
they couldn't identify the thief. The cameras were just not powerful enough to
zoom close enough to recognize the thief.
| What measures
should our govt. take to help organizations protect their IT infrastructure
against terror attacks? |
The Govt. is now asking us to be compliant
with well defined IT security norms.
Jyoti Bandopadhyay, VP-IT, Torrent PowerThe govt. should
standardize and enforce a uniform security framework that should be accepted
by organizations, both in the private and public sector.
Ashish Bharadwaj, UPES
Intelligence & surveillance systems with proactive controls.
BLV Rao, VP-IT Networks & Systems, Infotech Software
Information risk normally leads to business risk. Therefore, the govt.
should come forward to issue various directives to corporates as minimum
ruling to maintain certain security measures on various Internet / Intranet
based communication means (especially Internet and e-mailing) for daily
business working.
In the private sector as well, while recruiting personnel, police
verification must be kept mandatory before joining.
Sardindu Paul, GM-IT, ElectroSteel
In the IT ministry, the govt. should create a cell to handle and advise
corporates and SMBs from time to time on how to protect them from data
security threats.
Preet Kumar Singh, CIO, Glencore
Government can create some guidelines in line with SOX, making it
mandatory for organizations to adhere to IT security, and to create DR sites
for IT infrastructure. Plus, the govt needs to focus on building
infrastructure like roads, leased lines and Internet availability. The govt.
also needs to develop the capability to intercept and process information
flow (through telecom and the Internet) to take preventive and corrective
actions for suspicious activities. The police has to help organizations do
speedy and authentic scrutiny of new recruits. At present most IT
infrastructure is concentrated in Metros. To reduce the risk, we need to
create more data centers in tier 2 and tier 3 cities.
Nitin Doshi, Head-IT, Sterlite Industries |
Both of the above cases are examples where technology has been used just for
the sake of it, without serving any real purpose. Had the mall used CCTV cameras
with better optical zoom, they could have identified the thief and nabbed him
later. Had IP Surveillance been used, operation Taj would perhaps have ended
much faster. You might say that the Taj group would never have imagined in their
wildest of dreams that such an episode could ever happen to them. But then,
that's how disaster strikes!
So, it's important to understand that IT security goes much beyond
surveillance systems. It needs to ensure that the business can spring back into
action quickly a fter a terrorist attack. Essentially, a terror strike is an
unpredictable disaster, so you need to ensure that your business is able to
spring back into operation as quickly as possible after it happens. For
instance, post the Sep 11 attack on the world trade center towers, many
companies that had offices in those buildings managed to get back to business
because they had an effective DR and BCP strategy.
Which security technologies to deploy?
Security is no longer about protecting your data against virus and malicious
software attacks, nor is it about protecting it against hacking attempts or
against preventing disgruntled employees from stealing information. These you
need to do anyways. Today, security also means protection against infrastructure
mis-use and information leakage. How do you know that the person you've recently
recruited is the person who he/she claims to be? Maybe it's a terrorist. In
today's world, it doesn't really sound that absurd. How do you know that your
network is not being mis-used by terrorists for communication?
The moment you add this dimension, you see security in a whole new light. For
infrastructure mis-use, you need to put stringent access controls in all places,
like WiFi networks or in sensitive areas like data centers. For keeping a tab on
you employees, you need to put in stringent identity management systems,
possibly backed up by police verification.
There would be some measures that would be specific to different types of
verticals. The govt. for instance, needs to secure all its websites against
information theft, and from being hacked. Large buildings infrastructures like
commercial towers, shopping malls, railway stations, etc would need to put in
surveillance systems that can monitor specific things like how many times is an
unknown person making trips, or report suspicious unattended items lying around
for too long, etc. Page(s) 1 2
|