Tuesday, February 09, 2010  
Google
Web pcquest.com

CIOL Network sites

Search by Issue | Sitemap | Advanced Search

• For most updated version of DQ TOP 20 issue, visit dqindia.com • Visit the New Living Digital 2.0

Home > Hardware Reviews > Azza KT 133 TX

    Enterprise Solutions
    Hands On
    ITstrategy
    Developer
    Tech Forum
    SMB Forum
    Trends
    Shootout
    Reviews
    Editorials
    Linux and Open Source
    Technology
    Extraedge
    IT Careers
    Vertical Focus
    News & Launches

Subscribe to Print magazine.


now!


Newsletter


Azza KT 133 TX

An excellent price tag coupled with good performance helps this board come out toppers


Friday, February 09, 2001
Chipset: VIA KT 133
Price: Rs 5,192
Bundled software: Motherboard drivers, Virtual drive Full Personal Edition
Website: www.azzaboard.com 

The Azza KT 133 TX grabbed the top spot in the category of high-end Athlon boards. Being a Socket A interface, the board can take an Athlon or Duron processor. A major advantage that the board had over others in its category was the price. This, along with a two-year warranty, helped it gain a wide margin over the other two boards, which were priced above Rs 9,000. The motherboard is designed on an ATX form factor and all the slots are well placed and clearly marked. All ports are onboard and color-coded for easy identification. The manual is also very useful and informative.

The board can take up to 1.5 GB RAM in its three DIMM slots, which is more than enough. Expansion is also taken care of with five PCI slots. An ISA slot has been thrown in for backward compatibility. An AMR slot takes care of future audio/modem devices, and it also supports 4x AGP for high-end graphics cards. Its weakest area in features was the number of USB ports and support for UltraDMA 100. It had two built-in USB ports and a connector for two more. However, no connector cable was provided for the extra ones.

Performance-wise, the Azza KT 133 TX got respectable scores in all benchmarks, being a touch behind the other two boards in its category. In High-End Winstone99, it scored 52.2, while the Asus A7 Pro—the highest scorer in performance—managed 53.8. The difference in scores was higher in graphics and gaming benchmarks. In Quake III Arena, it gave an average frame rate of 86 fps, whereas the other two boards managed 105. In 3DWinbench2000, it scored 77.8 fps compared to 88.4 for the Asus A7 Pro. Its overall performance score was 91.5 out of 100 as against 98.8 scored by the Asus A7 Pro.

All said, a good deal considering its lucrative price tag.


Page(s)   1   

End of the article

PC Problems? Get a solution in 24 hours. Ask Tech Expert




Untitled Document



Levovo Thinkcentre for all of your business needs



Message boards

Discuss this and many other IT topics at the
CIOL message board

Previous Stories

Azza 693 ATX

ASUS CUBX-E

Mercury 693aFSX

   
 

 
 

Magazine Subscription | RQS | Contact Us | Team PCQuest | Advertising - Print | jobs@cybermedia