|
How to Choose and Benchmark a NAS
Continued from page: 3
Sunday, February 04, 2007
Review: LevelOne GNS 8000B
Cheapest of the lot, the LevelOne GNS 8000B was the only NAS box in the
shootout to ship with a redundant power supply. It was also the NAS with the
slowest processor, an Intel Celeron M 1.3 GHz. Plus, it had 512 MB RAM and a
total storage capacity of 2 TB. However, its usable storage capacity comes down
to around 1.3 TB, with the rest being used up for data protection. The NAS has
an LCD panel, which apart from displaying information, also lets you configure
its IP address. Then, of course, it has Web based management, which is pretty
easy to use. It has hot swappable hard drives, and unlike many other vendors,
who insist that you need to plug in a hard drive from them only, in this one,
you can plug in one on your own. So if (God forbid), one of the hard drives
crashes, you're not at the vendor's mercy to get yourself a replacement. The
NAS supports file systems like NFS, FTP, AppleTalk and provides DHCP and event
logs. Authentication is very simple and can be done in just 3 steps. This NAS
supports ADS and LDAP based authentication, as also RAID levels 5, 0, 1, and 10,
and comes pre-configured with level 5. You can't install an anti virus on it,
so it has to rely on an external anti-virus server for protection. On the down
side, it does not support file screening, so you can't control unwanted file
extensions from being stored on it. It can back up data to tape, DVD and even
supports snapshots.
| NetBench |
 |
| ^ IOMeter: I/Os per second |
The NAS gave consistent performance in all the tests. Being an entry-level
NAS, it's not meant to handle a very large number of clients. So the maximum
throughput it gave in NetBench was 239 Mbps, and that too with only five
clients. Beyond five clients, its performance dipped a little at 10 clients, but
interestingly it picked up again at 15 clients, resulting in 238 Mbps
throughput. It wasn't able to handle the load beyond 15 clients and its
throughput dropped continuously. In IOMeter, its performance is better with
smaller performance requests. So whether it was a random or sequential read or
write request we sent to the NAS, the maximum IOs per second for 64k requests
were always higher than 128k. Its performance in both sequential reading and
writing is much better than in random. Among other NAS boxes also, this one gave
better performance in random reads and writes for 128k requests.
Being an entry-level NAS, don't expect to do lots of file transfers to it.
It took the longest to copy a 100 GB mix of various files, at 101 minutes. The
same time reduced to half when we compressed these 100 GB files into a single
ISO image. Overall, this is a good choice for very small setups.
 |
Price: Rs 98,500 (5
yrs warranty)
Contact: Minds (India), Delhi, Tel: 09818299663
E-mail: jerry.albert@level1.co.in
SMS Buy 130221 to 6677 |
Next Page : Review: HP AIO 400Page(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6
|